Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4731 - 4740 of 20925 for word.

State v. Richard L. Kittilstad
engage in statutory interpretation. The statute fails to define the word “profession.” If a term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14055 - 2005-03-31

2008 WI APP 157
, except that technical or specially defined words are given their technical or special definitions. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34116 - 2008-10-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
coordinator, information processing, receptionist, secretary, transcriptionist, [or] word processor.” Veith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168387 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
this,” and “[t]here are no words for it.” We conclude that counsel’s sentencing remarks, in their entirety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239893 - 2019-04-25

State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
that they deprived him of a fair trial, i.e., a trial whose result is reliable. See id. In other words, in order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rudolph L. Jackson
“strong words,” but determined that the plea agreement had not been breached, and proceeded to sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6652 - 2005-03-31

Jeanne Finkenbinder v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.
arbitration, the words “of course” lead to the conclusion that the trial court erred in refusing to award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12047 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
that information to the deputy nonetheless. This is a red herring argument. Regardless of the exact words used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35777 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
works.” In other words, Mohawk suggested the checks could not be made out directly to borrowers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32752 - 2008-05-19

Velna I. Waite v. Easton-White Creek Lions, Inc.
words are given their technical or special definitions. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20721 - 2006-01-24