Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47301 - 47310 of 69439 for as he.

CA Blank Order
. In June 2003, he filed a motion to dismiss alleging his due process rights were violated by the fourteen
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95456 - 2013-04-15

State v. Reginald E. Sims
engaged in misconduct at the sentencing hearing when he informed the circuit court of certain uncharged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7544 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
as a repeater. Franklin was informed of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, and he has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476654 - 2022-01-25

[PDF] NOTICE
for a writ of mandamus. Further, to the extent that Davis is attempting to obtain other DNA evidence, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31930 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
citizen, moved to withdraw his pleas because he claimed to have been unaware that, as a consequence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29961 - 2014-09-15

May a judge testify at a Canadian administrative tribunal hearing on behalf of an interest group which seeks a binding administrative rule declaring that the Canadian Human Rights Act applies to the Canadian judiciary?
(2). The judge is proposed as a witness not only because he is a judge, but also because he uses
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=876 - 2005-03-31

State v. Carlos Facundo
as the clerk of this court, informed Facundo that he could reply to the no merit report, and he has done so.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11557 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Richard A. Walford
intoxicated, as a second offense. He asserts that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5701 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kathryn L. Johnson
headlight. After Bader stopped the car, he detected a strong odor of alcohol coming from inside the car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11224 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Matt Vandelac
that the violations had occurred but denied that he was personally liable for them. ΒΆ3 Vandelac was not an owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21717 - 2017-09-21