Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47301 - 47310 of 83395 for simple case search.

Caryl Sprague v. City of Madison
, inapplicable in this case. See La Crosse Footwear v. LIRC, 147 Wis.2d 419, 423, 434 N.W.2d 392, 394 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8261 - 2014-04-30

State v. April O.
. The trial court granted her request. No further issues, however, were discussed at this hearing. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15303 - 2005-03-31

State v. April O.
. The trial court granted her request. No further issues, however, were discussed at this hearing. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15304 - 2005-03-31

State v. April O.
. The trial court granted her request. No further issues, however, were discussed at this hearing. The case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15305 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768452 - 2024-02-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is No. 2022AP190-CR 2 appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771390 - 2024-03-05

COURT OF APPEALS
in exchange for concessions from the State with regard to its sentencing argument in his case. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116147 - 2014-07-07

[PDF] State v. Terry V. Anderson
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1600-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12565 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
no-merit report and a further response from Germano. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144512 - 2015-07-12

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 18, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
concerning the unsafe conditions on the property ... essential to Mr. Anthony’s case ....” We disagree. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50177 - 2010-05-17