Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47311 - 47320 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 47311 - 47320 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
Bruce A. Rumage v. Gary A. McCaughtry
the case because Rumage had failed to comply with the notice of claim statute, § 893.82(3), STATS., had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12373 - 2017-09-21
the case because Rumage had failed to comply with the notice of claim statute, § 893.82(3), STATS., had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12373 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ronald R. Kotas
that he claims would have materially affected the outcome of his case. Kotas stated that Jerry Parado
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16131 - 2017-09-21
that he claims would have materially affected the outcome of his case. Kotas stated that Jerry Parado
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16131 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731965 - 2023-11-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731965 - 2023-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731965 - 2023-11-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731965 - 2023-11-22
State v. Todd D. Dagnall
in this case. See State v. Arredondo, 2004 WI App 7, ¶40, 269 Wis. 2d 369, 674 N.W.2d 647 (to show counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24497 - 2006-03-15
in this case. See State v. Arredondo, 2004 WI App 7, ¶40, 269 Wis. 2d 369, 674 N.W.2d 647 (to show counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24497 - 2006-03-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was revoked in both cases referenced above. His appellate counsel, Kathleen A. Lindgren, has filed no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775463 - 2024-03-13
was revoked in both cases referenced above. His appellate counsel, Kathleen A. Lindgren, has filed no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=775463 - 2024-03-13
State v. William J. Ludwig
any reason in this case, because none of those factors that I mentioned; mentally or physically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15313 - 2005-03-31
any reason in this case, because none of those factors that I mentioned; mentally or physically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15313 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas J. Becker
in two of the bail jumping cases. Becker's appellate counsel has filed a no merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10496 - 2005-03-31
in two of the bail jumping cases. Becker's appellate counsel has filed a no merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10496 - 2005-03-31
Maurice Schirmacher v. Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company
. Because liability was admitted, the case proceeded against Threshermen’s on the issue of damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11693 - 2005-03-31
. Because liability was admitted, the case proceeded against Threshermen’s on the issue of damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11693 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110006 - 2014-04-03
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110006 - 2014-04-03