Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47321 - 47330 of 55722 for n y c.
Search results 47321 - 47330 of 55722 for n y c.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“deserved to be punished.” The court explained its decision to the juror in this way: “[N]o one thinks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74579 - 2014-09-15
“deserved to be punished.” The court explained its decision to the juror in this way: “[N]o one thinks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74579 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is within the circuit court’s discretion. Mikrut v. State, 212 Wis. 2d 859, 868 n.3, 569 N.W.2d 765 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92106 - 2013-01-28
is within the circuit court’s discretion. Mikrut v. State, 212 Wis. 2d 859, 868 n.3, 569 N.W.2d 765 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92106 - 2013-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal—we cannot reach the conclusion that Harris seeks. See Wurtz v. Fleischman, 97 Wis. 2d 100, 107 n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87090 - 2012-09-17
on appeal—we cannot reach the conclusion that Harris seeks. See Wurtz v. Fleischman, 97 Wis. 2d 100, 107 n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87090 - 2012-09-17
COURT OF APPEALS
with “erroneous exercise of discretion.” See, e.g., Shirk v. Bowling, Inc., 2001 WI 36, ¶9 n.6, 242 Wis. 2d 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113388 - 2014-06-02
with “erroneous exercise of discretion.” See, e.g., Shirk v. Bowling, Inc., 2001 WI 36, ¶9 n.6, 242 Wis. 2d 153
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113388 - 2014-06-02
State v. Lee Raven
personnel might inhibit rescue efforts and efforts to gather evidence. Finally, the court stated “[i]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15650 - 2005-03-31
personnel might inhibit rescue efforts and efforts to gather evidence. Finally, the court stated “[i]n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason K.
, 386 n.12, 418 N.W.2d 804 (1988). Therefore, we will follow the logic of the discussion in Annala
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2930 - 2017-09-19
, 386 n.12, 418 N.W.2d 804 (1988). Therefore, we will follow the logic of the discussion in Annala
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2930 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jimmy Lee Hensley
-4- compelled. United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 665 n.38 (1984). As stated in Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9812 - 2017-09-19
-4- compelled. United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 665 n.38 (1984). As stated in Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9812 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not, address these arguments. See Turner v. Taylor, 2003 WI App 256, ¶1 n.1, 268 Wis. 2d 628, 673 N.W.2d 716
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=276715 - 2020-08-11
not, address these arguments. See Turner v. Taylor, 2003 WI App 256, ¶1 n.1, 268 Wis. 2d 628, 673 N.W.2d 716
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=276715 - 2020-08-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
State v. Hinkle, 2019 WI 96, ¶10 n.10, 389 Wis. 2d 1, 935 N.W.2d 271 (defining read-in charges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278077 - 2020-08-13
State v. Hinkle, 2019 WI 96, ¶10 n.10, 389 Wis. 2d 1, 935 N.W.2d 271 (defining read-in charges
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278077 - 2020-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony at the revocation proceedings. We note again that “[a]n individual on [supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118569 - 2014-07-30
testimony at the revocation proceedings. We note again that “[a]n individual on [supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118569 - 2014-07-30