Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47351 - 47360 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 47351 - 47360 of 59327 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Larry E. Kraemer
] This testimony belies the claim Kraemer advances on appeal that “No evidence was presented by the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13356 - 2005-03-31
] This testimony belies the claim Kraemer advances on appeal that “No evidence was presented by the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13356 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
faced and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=361849 - 2021-04-29
faced and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=361849 - 2021-04-29
[PDF]
Elizabeth A. Connor v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
her claim that she was discharged from employment by Heckel’s restaurant because of her age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2548 - 2017-09-19
her claim that she was discharged from employment by Heckel’s restaurant because of her age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2548 - 2017-09-19
State v. Daniel E. La Fave
. Because the record supports the trial court's findings of fact and those findings defeat LaFave's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8695 - 2005-03-31
. Because the record supports the trial court's findings of fact and those findings defeat LaFave's claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8695 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331178 - 2021-02-03
, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331178 - 2021-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that there is no arguable merit to seeking No. 2023AP2004-CRNM 3 plea withdrawal based on a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814801 - 2024-06-24
that there is no arguable merit to seeking No. 2023AP2004-CRNM 3 plea withdrawal based on a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814801 - 2024-06-24
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
amounts claimed as restitution, the issue is not before the court and the court need not make detailed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99313 - 2014-09-15
amounts claimed as restitution, the issue is not before the court and the court need not make detailed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99313 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. 2d 115, 120, 289 N.W.2d 357 (Ct. App. 1980). We therefore reject Swinson’s claim that the return
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93275 - 2014-09-15
. 2d 115, 120, 289 N.W.2d 357 (Ct. App. 1980). We therefore reject Swinson’s claim that the return
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93275 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
withdrawal based on a claim of a defect in the plea colloquy. See id., ¶7 (postconviction motion for plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456960 - 2021-11-24
withdrawal based on a claim of a defect in the plea colloquy. See id., ¶7 (postconviction motion for plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456960 - 2021-11-24
State v. James G. Freer
of the case.” Id. ¶5 The circuit court rejected Freer’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6330 - 2005-03-31
of the case.” Id. ¶5 The circuit court rejected Freer’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6330 - 2005-03-31