Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47351 - 47360 of 68527 for did.
Search results 47351 - 47360 of 68527 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Eric S. Fenz
that we decrease his sentence by that amount. Because we conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4012 - 2017-09-20
that we decrease his sentence by that amount. Because we conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4012 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Donald C.
to communicate with” him. The trial court granted the motion at a hearing that Donald C. did not attend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6706 - 2017-09-20
to communicate with” him. The trial court granted the motion at a hearing that Donald C. did not attend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6706 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Uni-General Corporation v. Century 21 Great American Homes, Inc.
to the contract. Because the contract that defined the parties’ obligations to one another did not include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14049 - 2014-09-15
to the contract. Because the contract that defined the parties’ obligations to one another did not include
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14049 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tyrone Davis Smith
, it went off. QAnd how many times did you fire the gun? AAll I can remember, I just pulled the trigger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10365 - 2005-03-31
, it went off. QAnd how many times did you fire the gun? AAll I can remember, I just pulled the trigger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10365 - 2005-03-31
Robert E. Bowman v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
. The zoning administrator did not interpret the ordinance in the manner requested by Bowman. Bowman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11252 - 2005-03-31
. The zoning administrator did not interpret the ordinance in the manner requested by Bowman. Bowman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Belinda C. Wolf
in a presumption of prejudice, particularly because the Wolfs did not expressly agree to the deferred prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16197 - 2017-09-21
in a presumption of prejudice, particularly because the Wolfs did not expressly agree to the deferred prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16197 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, the circuit court conducted a hearing on the motions for contempt, where it heard arguments but did not take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126143 - 2014-11-10
, the circuit court conducted a hearing on the motions for contempt, where it heard arguments but did not take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126143 - 2014-11-10
COURT OF APPEALS
did not apprise her of her procedural rights as required under both the lease and federal regulations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31456 - 2008-01-15
did not apprise her of her procedural rights as required under both the lease and federal regulations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31456 - 2008-01-15
State v. James E. Powell
contact in Illinois.” However, the prosecutor did not acknowledge that he possessed Tim's presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9474 - 2005-03-31
contact in Illinois.” However, the prosecutor did not acknowledge that he possessed Tim's presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9474 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not testify. However, the jury heard testimony from a deputy relating post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249753 - 2019-11-07
did not testify. However, the jury heard testimony from a deputy relating post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249753 - 2019-11-07