Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47361 - 47370 of 55321 for n c.
Search results 47361 - 47370 of 55321 for n c.
COURT OF APPEALS
or 940.20 (1m), or domestic abuse, as defined in s. 813.12 (1) (am), pars. (am), (b), and (c) do not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31654 - 2008-01-28
or 940.20 (1m), or domestic abuse, as defined in s. 813.12 (1) (am), pars. (am), (b), and (c) do not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31654 - 2008-01-28
CA Blank Order
Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862 Lane M. Lewandowski, #375622 John C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134690 - 2015-02-10
Asst. State Public Defender P.O. Box 7862 Madison, WI 53707-7862 Lane M. Lewandowski, #375622 John C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134690 - 2015-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
for Hepatitis C. The court considered Baez’s pending charges, including two felonies and one misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32732 - 2008-05-19
for Hepatitis C. The court considered Baez’s pending charges, including two felonies and one misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32732 - 2008-05-19
Joshua Beaulieu v. David H. Schwarz
hearings. See Wis. Stat. § 911.01(4)(c). However, a violation of probation may not be proved entirely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4145 - 2005-03-31
hearings. See Wis. Stat. § 911.01(4)(c). However, a violation of probation may not be proved entirely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4145 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert E. Irish
, v. ROBERT C. IRISH,† Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11250 - 2005-03-31
, v. ROBERT C. IRISH,† Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11250 - 2005-03-31
Sheila R. McDonald v. Ardyth M. McDonald
(3)(c)2.,[5] she and her attorney “knew, or should have known, that the appeal … was without any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25523 - 2006-07-25
(3)(c)2.,[5] she and her attorney “knew, or should have known, that the appeal … was without any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25523 - 2006-07-25
COURT OF APPEALS
this appeal in bad faith solely to maliciously injure her. See Wis. Stat. § 809.25(3)(c)1. We may not award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35671 - 2009-03-03
this appeal in bad faith solely to maliciously injure her. See Wis. Stat. § 809.25(3)(c)1. We may not award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35671 - 2009-03-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
entered the following opinion and order: 2017AP1271-CR State v. Tommie R. Rothenberger (L. C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208387 - 2018-02-13
entered the following opinion and order: 2017AP1271-CR State v. Tommie R. Rothenberger (L. C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208387 - 2018-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the State cited Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(3), it failed to comply with Rule 809.23(3)(c), which requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77607 - 2012-02-06
the State cited Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(3), it failed to comply with Rule 809.23(3)(c), which requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77607 - 2012-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
hardship. Wis. Stat. § 59.694(7)(c). The onus is on the property owner to prove unnecessary hardship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77630 - 2012-02-07
hardship. Wis. Stat. § 59.694(7)(c). The onus is on the property owner to prove unnecessary hardship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77630 - 2012-02-07