Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4741 - 4750 of 82976 for case search.
Search results 4741 - 4750 of 82976 for case search.
State v. Malcolm M. Mumm
, cannot be analyzed for evidentiary purposes without obtaining a second search warrant. In Thorstad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3415 - 2005-03-31
, cannot be analyzed for evidentiary purposes without obtaining a second search warrant. In Thorstad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3415 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Howard
a search of Howard’s premises and vehicles for evidence relating to suspected drug activity. The warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6247 - 2005-03-31
a search of Howard’s premises and vehicles for evidence relating to suspected drug activity. The warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6247 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Malcolm M. Mumm
for evidentiary purposes without obtaining a second search warrant. In Thorstad, citing to Schmerber v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3415 - 2017-09-19
for evidentiary purposes without obtaining a second search warrant. In Thorstad, citing to Schmerber v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3415 - 2017-09-19
State v. Everton Taylor
in support of the application for a warrant to search his residence included statements that were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
in support of the application for a warrant to search his residence included statements that were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Everton Taylor
-3514-CR 2 arrest; and (2) testimony in support of the application for a warrant to search his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3438 - 2017-09-19
-3514-CR 2 arrest; and (2) testimony in support of the application for a warrant to search his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3438 - 2017-09-19
State v. Peter J. Pronold
motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant and several subpoenas. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14935 - 2005-03-31
motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant and several subpoenas. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14935 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregory Hoppe
marijuana. The sole issue is the propriety of the no-knock search warrant executed at Hoppe’s home. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12716 - 2005-03-31
marijuana. The sole issue is the propriety of the no-knock search warrant executed at Hoppe’s home. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12716 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and search of his vehicle and the validity of the search warrant that followed. After Jones turned himself
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=427019 - 2021-09-21
and search of his vehicle and the validity of the search warrant that followed. After Jones turned himself
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=427019 - 2021-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
warrantless search. The circuit court denied the motion after a hearing. Matlock then agreed to resolve
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252647 - 2020-01-17
warrantless search. The circuit court denied the motion after a hearing. Matlock then agreed to resolve
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252647 - 2020-01-17
State v. Daymon D. Tate
, and the police went to his home. After entering the home, the police commenced a search that uncovered large
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6148 - 2005-03-31
, and the police went to his home. After entering the home, the police commenced a search that uncovered large
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6148 - 2005-03-31