Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4741 - 4750 of 15488 for fee.

[PDF] Jon F. T. v. Karen L.
placement of the child.1 Karen L. requests that attorney fees and costs be assessed against Jon T. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16245 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] William J. Marth v. Robert Jahn
attorney’s fees pursuant to § 814.025, STATS., the frivolous claims statute. On appeal, Marth raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14934 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
an advance payment of $1800 pursuant to a fee agreement signed on that date. The fee agreement provided
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29264 - 2007-05-31

Jon F. T. v. Karen L.
included equal placement of the child.[1] Karen L. requests that attorney fees and costs be assessed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16245 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Janice Renee Maxwell v. Jody Justin Maxwell
and fees associated with the modification proceeding. She No. 02-1845 2 argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5460 - 2017-09-19

Verlyn A. Schleusner v. William R. Lamb
of contributory negligence and that the court should have reimbursed him for the expert fees that he was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2667 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to this appeal, ordered that Mark pay guardian ad litem fees, expert fees, and attorney fees regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232923 - 2019-01-17

Firstar Bank of Milwaukee, N.A. v. Carl W. Berntsen
$14,633.25, including $695 in attorney’s fees, was entered pursuant to Firstar’s motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13730 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Verlyn A. Schleusner v. William R. Lamb
fees that he was charged. We disagree and dismiss the cross-appeal. BACKGROUND ¶3 Lamb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2667 - 2017-09-19

William J. Marth v. Robert Jahn
and awarding actual attorney’s fees pursuant to § 814.025, Stats., the frivolous claims statute. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14934 - 2005-03-31