Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4741 - 4750 of 83258 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 4741 - 4750 of 83258 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Bill Paul Marquardt
but not included in the search warrant application; (3) Did the investigation in these cases meet
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1232 - 2017-09-19
but not included in the search warrant application; (3) Did the investigation in these cases meet
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1232 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bill P. Marquardt
discovery. Specifically: (1) Does the search warrant application in this case meet the third test set out
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1231 - 2005-02-07
discovery. Specifically: (1) Does the search warrant application in this case meet the third test set out
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1231 - 2005-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Bill P. Marquardt
but not included in the search warrant application; (3) Did the investigation in these cases meet
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1231 - 2017-09-19
but not included in the search warrant application; (3) Did the investigation in these cases meet
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1231 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bill Paul Marquardt
discovery. Specifically: (1) Does the search warrant application in this case meet the third test set out
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1232 - 2005-02-07
discovery. Specifically: (1) Does the search warrant application in this case meet the third test set out
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1232 - 2005-02-07
State v. William H. Foucault
conclusion that a search of their residence was consensual. We disagree and affirm the judgments. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15321 - 2005-03-31
conclusion that a search of their residence was consensual. We disagree and affirm the judgments. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15321 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
extent on the fact that, in some of our other cases upholding searches under the community caretaker
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161388 - 2017-09-21
extent on the fact that, in some of our other cases upholding searches under the community caretaker
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161388 - 2017-09-21
WI App 12 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2008AP880-CR Complete Title ...
entry and search and denied the motion to suppress. ¶15 The case was tried to a jury in February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34787 - 2009-01-27
entry and search and denied the motion to suppress. ¶15 The case was tried to a jury in February
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34787 - 2009-01-27
[PDF]
WI App 12
the warrantless entry and search and denied the motion to suppress. ¶15 The case was tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34787 - 2014-09-15
the warrantless entry and search and denied the motion to suppress. ¶15 The case was tried to a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34787 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kiemonte Lamont King
. at 705. In King's case, since the warrant authorized a search of people on the target premises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10730 - 2017-09-20
. at 705. In King's case, since the warrant authorized a search of people on the target premises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10730 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Kiemonte Lamont King
. at 705. In King's case, since the warrant authorized a search of people on the target premises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10729 - 2017-09-20
. at 705. In King's case, since the warrant authorized a search of people on the target premises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10729 - 2017-09-20