Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47461 - 47470 of 74837 for public records.
Search results 47461 - 47470 of 74837 for public records.
State v. Randolph S. Bauernfeind
on the record, the trial court also properly found that trial counsel adequately advised Bauernfeind that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
on the record, the trial court also properly found that trial counsel adequately advised Bauernfeind that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
Paul Fochs v. John Buch
considered facts of record and its reasoning results in a rational and legally sound decision. See Burkes v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13928 - 2005-03-31
considered facts of record and its reasoning results in a rational and legally sound decision. See Burkes v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13928 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871640 - 2024-11-06
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871640 - 2024-11-06
Joyce Judith Syphard v. Ronald James Syphard
if the record demonstrates that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion or applied the wrong legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5243 - 2005-03-31
if the record demonstrates that the trial court failed to exercise its discretion or applied the wrong legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5243 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David Gunderman v. Jack Hartwig
was $30,000. Because the record supports the trial court’s findings of fact, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16157 - 2017-09-21
was $30,000. Because the record supports the trial court’s findings of fact, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16157 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tina H.
ordered by the court. The record reflects that the Department of Social Services complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13017 - 2005-03-31
ordered by the court. The record reflects that the Department of Social Services complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13017 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael C. Cull
. An appellate court will search the record for evidence that supports the trial court’s factual findings. In re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13225 - 2005-03-31
. An appellate court will search the record for evidence that supports the trial court’s factual findings. In re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13225 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of an action. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247724 - 2019-10-01
of an action. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247724 - 2019-10-01
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
report, and an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919441 - 2025-02-26
report, and an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919441 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
report, and an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919441 - 2025-02-26
report, and an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919441 - 2025-02-26