Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47481 - 47490 of 82610 for case codes/1000.

State v. William L. Brockett
2002 WI App 115 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1295-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3960 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Margaret Jane Kozlowicz v. Jeffrey David Schwartz
statute [§ 767.275, STATS.], a statute applicable only in family law cases and seldom used by even family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10090 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
their plan to file new claims in the Wisconsin case, the Illinois court entered an order dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027338 - 2025-10-22

[PDF] Milwaukee Police Association v. City of Milwaukee
2002 WI App 43 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-1057
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3863 - 2017-09-20

Milwaukee Police Association v. City of Milwaukee
2002 WI App 43 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1057 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3863 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Johnny D. Polk
that this was a firm date and the case would not be adjourned again. At this point, Polk fired Bartell and paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3533 - 2017-09-19

Margaret J. Schwartz v. Jeffrey D. Schwartz
[§ 767.275, Stats.], a statute applicable only in family law cases and seldom used by even family law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8683 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Stan Smith, Inc. v. Robert Fransway
their disputes with Smith and were dismissed from the case at various stages. This appeal involves only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10435 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
contract CPL sold to Mark K. and Mary A. Palkowski. While this case presents a variation on the theme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80533 - 2012-04-10

James Komarek v. Wisconsin Valley Improvement Co., Inc.
and equity.” Id. at 305-06. This fairness determination “should be made on a case-by-case basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2609 - 2005-03-31