Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47481 - 47490 of 56213 for n y c.

[PDF] State v. Ronnie J. Frayer
. STAT. §§ 961.41(3g)(c) and 961.48(1). This charge resulted from a search of Frayer at the jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2521 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
)(a)-(c) states that the court shall retain jurisdiction unless the juvenile proves, by a preponderance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072859 - 2026-03-25

[PDF] State v. Scott E. Oberst
. STAT. §§ 961.41(3g)(c) and 961.48(1). This charge resulted from a search of Frayer at the jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2522 - 2017-09-19

Frontsheet
"regardless of the purpose." Wis. Stat. § 972.11(2)(c); Pulizzano, 155 Wis. 2d at 644. "The rape shield law
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117727 - 2014-07-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JANET C. PROTASIEWICZ, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362040 - 2021-05-04

[PDF] WI App 82
gave his statements. c. Berggren did not unequivocally invoke his right to counsel. ¶33 We now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36590 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Exxonmobil Oil Corporation v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of La Crosse
for such public purpose. (b) Describing the property and the interest therein sought to be taken. (c) Stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19005 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] General Star Indemnity Company v. The Bankruptcy Estate of Lake Geneva Sugar Shack, Inc.
of Appeals District II 2727 N. Grandview Blvd. Waukesha, WI 53188-1672 Court of Appeals District IV
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11170 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. Louise Tesmer
and LaFollette & Sinykin and James C. Alexander and Wisconsin Judicial Commission, all of Madison, and oral
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17243 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
not in the protected class were treated more favorably.” Id. at 390 n.4. If the complainant demonstrates a prima
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93280 - 2013-02-25