Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47561 - 47570 of 64735 for b's.
Search results 47561 - 47570 of 64735 for b's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to her home. See § 48.415(2)(a)2.b. The court instructed the jury that a “reasonable effort
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546154 - 2022-07-19
to her home. See § 48.415(2)(a)2.b. The court instructed the jury that a “reasonable effort
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546154 - 2022-07-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
without such a description. See WIS. STAT. § 706.02(1)(b) (“Transactions under [WIS. STAT. §] 706.001(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536142 - 2022-06-23
without such a description. See WIS. STAT. § 706.02(1)(b) (“Transactions under [WIS. STAT. §] 706.001(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536142 - 2022-06-23
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Steven H.
pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 48.415(2)(a), (b) and (c), or, alternatively under § 48.415(1)(a)(2), that both
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17446 - 2017-09-21
pursuant to Wis. Stat. §§ 48.415(2)(a), (b) and (c), or, alternatively under § 48.415(1)(a)(2), that both
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17446 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
challenge fails. We turn to Onyeukwu’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims. B. Ineffective Assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135726 - 2015-02-25
challenge fails. We turn to Onyeukwu’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims. B. Ineffective Assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135726 - 2015-02-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Clark County: LYNDSEY A. B. BRUNETTE, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796476 - 2024-05-02
an order of the circuit court for Clark County: LYNDSEY A. B. BRUNETTE, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796476 - 2024-05-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
regarding Barnes’ hearsay challenge also resolves his confrontation argument.7 B. Barnes’ statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346592 - 2021-03-16
regarding Barnes’ hearsay challenge also resolves his confrontation argument.7 B. Barnes’ statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346592 - 2021-03-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” and that the defendant’s “invasion is either (a) [i]ntentional and unreasonable, or (b) [u]nintentional and otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965297 - 2025-06-03
” and that the defendant’s “invasion is either (a) [i]ntentional and unreasonable, or (b) [u]nintentional and otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965297 - 2025-06-03
[PDF]
Frontsheet
to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.10(1m)(a) and 939.62(1)(b); resisting or obstructing an officer as a repeater
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133439 - 2017-09-21
to Wis. Stat. §§ 943.10(1m)(a) and 939.62(1)(b); resisting or obstructing an officer as a repeater
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133439 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
at the number listed above if you have any questions or comments. Livesey and Per Mar stipulated that “[b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28659 - 2014-09-15
at the number listed above if you have any questions or comments. Livesey and Per Mar stipulated that “[b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28659 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 37
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas B. Aquino, assistant state public defender of Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371382 - 2021-07-14
, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas B. Aquino, assistant state public defender of Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=371382 - 2021-07-14