Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47561 - 47570 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 47561 - 47570 of 84312 for case number.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶2 The parties agree that the facts of this case are undisputed as stated in the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59061 - 2014-09-15
. ¶2 The parties agree that the facts of this case are undisputed as stated in the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59061 - 2014-09-15
Arnold E. Smith v. Douglas G. Slock
. By order dated June 11, 1996, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited appeals calendar. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10807 - 2005-03-31
. By order dated June 11, 1996, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited appeals calendar. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10807 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141127 - 2017-09-21
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141127 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752026 - 2024-01-24
Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752026 - 2024-01-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150292 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150292 - 2017-09-21
Certification
violates the Wisconsin Constitution’s marriage amendment. Specifically, this case presents the question
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84445 - 2012-07-04
violates the Wisconsin Constitution’s marriage amendment. Specifically, this case presents the question
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84445 - 2012-07-04
[PDF]
State v. Torrey Y.
-3427-FT 2 contends that his conduct did not result in damage under the facts of this case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14836 - 2017-09-21
-3427-FT 2 contends that his conduct did not result in damage under the facts of this case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14836 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Carolyn Rae Jarman v. Larry Howard Welter
2006 WI APP 54 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP1616
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21398 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 54 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP1616
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21398 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2021 WI 5 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2014AP1651-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328776 - 2021-01-27
2021 WI 5 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2014AP1651-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328776 - 2021-01-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204253 - 2017-11-29
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204253 - 2017-11-29