Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47571 - 47580 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 47571 - 47580 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29947 - 2007-08-06
may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29947 - 2007-08-06
State v. Kirk Ennenga
from an order denying his motion for resentencing. Ennenga claims the sentencing judge should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15011 - 2005-05-24
from an order denying his motion for resentencing. Ennenga claims the sentencing judge should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15011 - 2005-05-24
CA Blank Order
to a claim that the evidence was insufficient. Our review of the trial record also discloses no procedural
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122145 - 2014-09-17
to a claim that the evidence was insufficient. Our review of the trial record also discloses no procedural
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122145 - 2014-09-17
Jevic Enterprises, Inc. v. Arlo E. Schultz
, leaving the Schultzes in no position to claim estoppel because he believed and relied on that incorrect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3927 - 2005-03-31
, leaving the Schultzes in no position to claim estoppel because he believed and relied on that incorrect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3927 - 2005-03-31
State v. James E. Schultz
] and for an order to suppress the evidence seized from his residence, claiming that material facts were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10215 - 2005-03-31
] and for an order to suppress the evidence seized from his residence, claiming that material facts were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10215 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
“[A]ny claim that could have been raised on direct appeal or in a previous Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58005 - 2010-12-20
“[A]ny claim that could have been raised on direct appeal or in a previous Wis. Stat. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58005 - 2010-12-20
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. James Wilson Associates
amount due, approximately $1.9 million, First Nationwide cross-claimed, alleging a default based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8405 - 2005-03-31
amount due, approximately $1.9 million, First Nationwide cross-claimed, alleging a default based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8405 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Mola
, this contention does nothing to support his claim that the error was not harmless. 2 Mola contends both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6867 - 2017-09-20
, this contention does nothing to support his claim that the error was not harmless. 2 Mola contends both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6867 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Paul W. Schnelz
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because no probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11214 - 2017-09-19
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because no probable cause existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11214 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John R. Brunette
claims that the policy underlying the extended appeal time in § 808.04(5), is to afford those persons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11277 - 2017-09-19
claims that the policy underlying the extended appeal time in § 808.04(5), is to afford those persons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11277 - 2017-09-19