Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4761 - 4770 of 12050 for ch.

[PDF] NOTICE
.” The circuit court dismissed the action based on sovereign immunity. It also concluded that WIS. STAT. ch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32701 - 2014-09-15

Harold J. Matis v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
the commission’s findings reviewable under Wis. Stat. ch. 227 and provide a “substantial evidence” standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4484 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Carl J. Knapp
are: a change in the health of his mother; enactment of ch. 980, STATS.; and new parole commission rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9262 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. It also concluded that Wis. Stat. ch 227 provides the exclusive remedy and the issue is not justiciable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32701 - 2008-05-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. STAT. ch. 227].” WISCONSIN STAT. § 227.53(1) provides that, “[e]xcept as otherwise specifically
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133872 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of Health Services petitioned for protective placement of B.R.P. under WIS. STAT. ch. 55.2 B.R.P.’s case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=391516 - 2021-07-15

Town of Barton v. Division of Hearings and Appeals
PER CURIAM. The Town of Barton (Town) appeals from a judgment dismissing its Wis. Stat. ch. 227
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2524 - 2005-03-31

State v. Shawn Schulpius
that as applied to Schulpius, Wis. Stat. Ch. 980 presented an unconstitutional violation of the double jeopardy
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
. Stat. ch. 48 for termination proceedings were not met. However, continuances “upon a showing of good
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120489 - 2014-09-02

[PDF] May a judge testify at a Canadian administrative tribunal hearing on behalf of an interest group which seeks a binding administrative rule declaring that the Canadian Human Rights Act applies to the Canadian judiciary?
and Employees, subchapter III of Ch. 19 of the statutes. I hereby certify that this is Formal Opinion
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876 - 2017-09-20