Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47601 - 47610 of 62178 for child support.
Search results 47601 - 47610 of 62178 for child support.
[PDF]
Jesus Barbary v. Charles Stokes
reasonable basis in law or equity and could not be supported by a good faith argument for an extension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11580 - 2017-09-19
reasonable basis in law or equity and could not be supported by a good faith argument for an extension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11580 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
relatedly sought resentencing for the lesser offense. McBain argued that the facts did not support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837187 - 2024-08-13
relatedly sought resentencing for the lesser offense. McBain argued that the facts did not support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=837187 - 2024-08-13
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
implementation of the consecutive sentence is a new factor and supports modification to a concurrent sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93296 - 2014-09-15
implementation of the consecutive sentence is a new factor and supports modification to a concurrent sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93296 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
against whom Tubbs threatened “imminent use of force.” Thus, the record does not support Tubbs’s argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92807 - 2013-02-07
against whom Tubbs threatened “imminent use of force.” Thus, the record does not support Tubbs’s argument
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92807 - 2013-02-07
August Table of unpublished opinions
court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41 - 2004-09-06
court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41 - 2004-09-06
State v. Leonard R. Miller
N.W.2d 116, 122 (1976). The evidence here does not support a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11479 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 116, 122 (1976). The evidence here does not support a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11479 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The lay witness in support of Brown’s motion however, failed to appear for the hearing. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44824 - 2014-09-15
. The lay witness in support of Brown’s motion however, failed to appear for the hearing. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44824 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
requirement that the finding be supported by independent evidence of any kind. Steven testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917150 - 2025-02-20
requirement that the finding be supported by independent evidence of any kind. Steven testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917150 - 2025-02-20
State v. Treble Hworb Henderson
they would support a motion for plea withdrawal. Specifically, he claims that he would not have entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3031 - 2005-03-31
they would support a motion for plea withdrawal. Specifically, he claims that he would not have entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3031 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. George T. Nicoll
. Furthermore, the record does not support Nicoll’s assertion that he was cooperative in his prior treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13707 - 2014-09-15
. Furthermore, the record does not support Nicoll’s assertion that he was cooperative in his prior treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13707 - 2014-09-15