Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47601 - 47610 of 84365 for simple case search/1000.

[MS WORD] FA-609: Notice of Hearing and Motion to Enforce Physical Placement Order
of the county in which the original case was filed. STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT, COUNTY Check
/formdisplay/FA-609.doc?formNumber=FA-609&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-07-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in two burglary cases that were jointly handled in the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102890 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156738 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ricki D. Bunnell
, however, that Donner should not govern this case because there the defendant’s intoxilyzer test produced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12086 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] AFSCME v. Milwaukee County
that the case is dismissed?" The court said "yes, the case is dismissed." The attorney for AFSCME then asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10133 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jeffrey E. Piper v. Valeria J. Piper
that she is elderly and cannot keep up with the children “forever.” In a close case, the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13478 - 2017-09-21

Irma T. Wiedmeyer v. Doris E. Carriveau
from the trial court’s judgment dismissing her case against Doris Carriveau as a sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14009 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158429 - 2017-09-21

State v. Nickolas G. Carlson
. Our supreme court held in a seminal case interpreting the implied consent law: The defendant relies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9445 - 2005-03-31

Todd R. Silbaugh v. Strang, Inc.
is unconstitutional and whether this case is exempt from that statute because of fraud, concealment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15325 - 2005-03-31