Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47611 - 47620 of 68760 for had.
Search results 47611 - 47620 of 68760 for had.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reveals that the circuit court’s sentencing decision had a “rational and explainable basis.” See State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109957 - 2017-09-21
reveals that the circuit court’s sentencing decision had a “rational and explainable basis.” See State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109957 - 2017-09-21
State v. Everett Daniel Neal
Grogan testified that he pulled Neal over and that Neal had bloodshot and glassy eyes, slurred speech
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10294 - 2008-10-14
Grogan testified that he pulled Neal over and that Neal had bloodshot and glassy eyes, slurred speech
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10294 - 2008-10-14
CA Blank Order
. Neither of those issues can be raised in these appeals. Any challenge to the underlying conviction had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92923 - 2013-02-18
. Neither of those issues can be raised in these appeals. Any challenge to the underlying conviction had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92923 - 2013-02-18
State v. Walter J. Griffin
Griffin if anybody had made any promises or considerations to induce his plea, other than a promise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22
Griffin if anybody had made any promises or considerations to induce his plea, other than a promise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24559 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
Randy O'Neill v. James Reemer
the trial that was held on remand. Following that trial, the court found that the O’Neills had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17786 - 2017-09-21
the trial that was held on remand. Following that trial, the court found that the O’Neills had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17786 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Carl J. Sweney v. Phyllis J. Sweney
because: (1) the child support standards had been revised since the divorce; and (2) various factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9819 - 2017-09-19
because: (1) the child support standards had been revised since the divorce; and (2) various factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9819 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kevin M. Kelsay
he had engaged in the practice of law while his license was under suspension in violation of SCR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16849 - 2017-09-21
he had engaged in the practice of law while his license was under suspension in violation of SCR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16849 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a letter from a doctor who had treated him prior to trial. The doctor opined that, at the time of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252918 - 2020-01-24
a letter from a doctor who had treated him prior to trial. The doctor opined that, at the time of trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252918 - 2020-01-24
Jeffrey E. Sobczak v. Eleanor Ciganek
with longer routes. He further testified that his earnings had dropped over $10,000 per year since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3371 - 2005-03-31
with longer routes. He further testified that his earnings had dropped over $10,000 per year since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3371 - 2005-03-31
Colleen Lundberg v. North Medical Transportation
of the notice under § 893.80(1)(b), Stats. They claimed that they had no knowledge of any involvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9420 - 2005-03-31
of the notice under § 893.80(1)(b), Stats. They claimed that they had no knowledge of any involvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9420 - 2005-03-31