Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47621 - 47630 of 73030 for petition.

COURT OF APPEALS
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59693 - 2011-02-07

State v. Stanley R. Scott
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11689 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47611 - 2010-03-03

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
subsequently petitioned the circuit court for a writ of certiorari challenging the Commission’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929301 - 2025-03-19

COURT OF APPEALS
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28618 - 2007-04-02

State v. Curtis P. Johnson
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7409 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jackie L. Putskey
Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14156 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904707 - 2025-01-24

John O. Shaline v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3728 - 2005-03-31

State v. Darryl E. Pierce
will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3800 - 2005-03-31