Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47631 - 47640 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 47631 - 47640 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
Thomas J. Roach v. Arlis M. Roach
Thomas Roach appeals the maintenance component of his divorce judgment. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7591 - 2017-09-19
Thomas Roach appeals the maintenance component of his divorce judgment. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7591 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel’s no-merit report thoroughly discusses whether any nonfrivolous claims arise from pretrial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550427 - 2022-08-03
counsel’s no-merit report thoroughly discusses whether any nonfrivolous claims arise from pretrial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550427 - 2022-08-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 3 plea withdrawal based on a claim that Matos-Rodriguez’s pleas were anything other than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
-CRNM 3 plea withdrawal based on a claim that Matos-Rodriguez’s pleas were anything other than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966766 - 2025-06-10
CA Blank Order
a judgment of the circuit court, which dismissed Griswold’s claims against all defendants and denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104394 - 2013-11-12
a judgment of the circuit court, which dismissed Griswold’s claims against all defendants and denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104394 - 2013-11-12
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32699 - 2008-05-12
to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32699 - 2008-05-12
State v. Earl J. De Cloux
police did not have reasonable suspicion to stop him. This court rejects his claim and affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25510 - 2008-09-25
police did not have reasonable suspicion to stop him. This court rejects his claim and affirms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25510 - 2008-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS
, and has not offered in his brief to this court, any support for his claim that he had a viable defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29127 - 2007-06-26
, and has not offered in his brief to this court, any support for his claim that he had a viable defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29127 - 2007-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
to statutory immunity from this action, we affirm the summary judgment dismissing Stellmach’s claims.[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114935 - 2005-03-31
to statutory immunity from this action, we affirm the summary judgment dismissing Stellmach’s claims.[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114935 - 2005-03-31
Thomas McPhetridge v. Jon E. Litscher
implausible claim that he innocently left the drink to sit out overnight in order to improve its taste
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4148 - 2015-07-14
implausible claim that he innocently left the drink to sit out overnight in order to improve its taste
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4148 - 2015-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
, there is nothing in the record that would factually support such a claim. ¶6 Bormuth asserts that he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146017 - 2015-08-10
, there is nothing in the record that would factually support such a claim. ¶6 Bormuth asserts that he made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146017 - 2015-08-10