Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47631 - 47640 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 47631 - 47640 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Joel A. DeWall
on the first factor. DeWall’s counsel claimed that, in light of the trial court’s comments, the attendance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15041 - 2005-03-31
on the first factor. DeWall’s counsel claimed that, in light of the trial court’s comments, the attendance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15041 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Scott Development Company, L.L.C. v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
testified that the remaining property’s value was reduced after the taking. Scott claims, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15949 - 2017-09-21
testified that the remaining property’s value was reduced after the taking. Scott claims, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15949 - 2017-09-21
Marie L. Kasten v. Doral Dental USA
to compel, claiming that Doral Dental had not provided several of the documents she had requested. Her
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24700 - 2006-04-04
to compel, claiming that Doral Dental had not provided several of the documents she had requested. Her
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24700 - 2006-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2015AP928 3 claims against State Farm. Jenna Melstrom and Benjamin Ross (Plaintiffs) argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163880 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP928 3 claims against State Farm. Jenna Melstrom and Benjamin Ross (Plaintiffs) argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163880 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the sufficiency of the complaint, there is no arguable merit to a claim that Smiley’s case should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926075 - 2025-03-12
the sufficiency of the complaint, there is no arguable merit to a claim that Smiley’s case should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926075 - 2025-03-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the circuit court rejected Thomas’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims without holding a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817450 - 2024-06-27
, the circuit court rejected Thomas’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims without holding a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817450 - 2024-06-27
State v. Emanuel G.
renews this claim on appeal, generally asserting a denial of constitutional rights. However, Emanuel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18453 - 2005-06-06
renews this claim on appeal, generally asserting a denial of constitutional rights. However, Emanuel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18453 - 2005-06-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
admitted that he “said something” to Q.R., but Gorins claimed he could not remember what he said because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145805 - 2017-09-21
admitted that he “said something” to Q.R., but Gorins claimed he could not remember what he said because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145805 - 2017-09-21
State v. William R. Peterson
proponent claims. Section 909.015(1), Stats. illustrates the following example of “authentication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13435 - 2005-03-31
proponent claims. Section 909.015(1), Stats. illustrates the following example of “authentication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13435 - 2005-03-31
State v. Matthew R.L.
of conspiring to deliver marijuana and one charge of possessing drug paraphernalia. He claims that the juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12080 - 2005-03-31
of conspiring to deliver marijuana and one charge of possessing drug paraphernalia. He claims that the juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12080 - 2005-03-31