Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47641 - 47650 of 82212 for judgment for m s.
Search results 47641 - 47650 of 82212 for judgment for m s.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
no arguably meritorious appellate issues and affirmed the judgment of conviction. See State v. Jarmon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26787 - 2006-10-16
no arguably meritorious appellate issues and affirmed the judgment of conviction. See State v. Jarmon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26787 - 2006-10-16
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP2273-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2009CF28
STAT. § 971.04(1)(g) provides that a defendant “shall be present” at the pronouncement of judgment
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64279 - 2014-09-15
STAT. § 971.04(1)(g) provides that a defendant “shall be present” at the pronouncement of judgment
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64279 - 2014-09-15
Certification
” at the pronouncement of judgment and the imposition of sentence. “Present” means “physically present.” State v
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64279 - 2011-05-16
” at the pronouncement of judgment and the imposition of sentence. “Present” means “physically present.” State v
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64279 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
State v. Michael I.
denying the County’s application for an increase in Michael I.’s child support obligation. The County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15482 - 2017-09-21
denying the County’s application for an increase in Michael I.’s child support obligation. The County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15482 - 2017-09-21
James R. Matlouck v. Randall R. Hepp
. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(8). We may not substitute our judgment for that of the agency as to the weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26583 - 2006-09-27
. Wis. Stat. § 227.57(8). We may not substitute our judgment for that of the agency as to the weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26583 - 2006-09-27
[PDF]
State v. Frankie Wardell Simmons
affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 According to the judgment rolls and plea questionnaire in the appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4039 - 2017-09-20
affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 According to the judgment rolls and plea questionnaire in the appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4039 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
sexual assault of Michelle S. At Bolstad’s jury trial, Michelle testified that on the night of June 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78455 - 2012-02-22
sexual assault of Michelle S. At Bolstad’s jury trial, Michelle testified that on the night of June 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78455 - 2012-02-22
State v. Frankie Wardell Simmons
. BACKGROUND ¶2 According to the judgment rolls and plea questionnaire in the appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4038 - 2005-03-31
. BACKGROUND ¶2 According to the judgment rolls and plea questionnaire in the appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4038 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frankie Wardell Simmons
. BACKGROUND ¶2 According to the judgment rolls and plea questionnaire in the appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4039 - 2005-03-31
. BACKGROUND ¶2 According to the judgment rolls and plea questionnaire in the appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4039 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael I.
application for an increase in Michael I.’s child support obligation. The County contends that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15482 - 2005-03-31
application for an increase in Michael I.’s child support obligation. The County contends that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15482 - 2005-03-31