Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4771 - 4780 of 16460 for h's.
Search results 4771 - 4780 of 16460 for h's.
[PDF]
State v. Scot A. Czarnecki
State v. James H. Oswald, 2000 WI App 3, ¶4, 232 Wis. 2d 103, 606 N.W.2d 238, review denied, __ Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15802 - 2017-09-21
State v. James H. Oswald, 2000 WI App 3, ¶4, 232 Wis. 2d 103, 606 N.W.2d 238, review denied, __ Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15802 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that: “[h]ad I known that there was going to be a nine-year mandatory minimum, I would have negotiated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643346 - 2023-04-11
that: “[h]ad I known that there was going to be a nine-year mandatory minimum, I would have negotiated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643346 - 2023-04-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a Class H felony, and misdemeanor retail theft. WIS. STAT. §§ 946.41(2r), 943.50(1m)(b), 943.50(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963881 - 2025-06-03
, a Class H felony, and misdemeanor retail theft. WIS. STAT. §§ 946.41(2r), 943.50(1m)(b), 943.50(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=963881 - 2025-06-03
[PDF]
WI 66
(2)15 and SCR 20:8.4(h),16 Attorney Stange failed to fully and fairly disclose to the OLR all facts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84159 - 2014-09-15
(2)15 and SCR 20:8.4(h),16 Attorney Stange failed to fully and fairly disclose to the OLR all facts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84159 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, or what does this mean? [THE COURT]: [Counsel], are you still there? .… COURT CLERK: [H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909592 - 2025-02-05
, or what does this mean? [THE COURT]: [Counsel], are you still there? .… COURT CLERK: [H
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909592 - 2025-02-05
State v. Eyad H. Hammad
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Eyad H. Hammad, Defendant-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9733 - 2005-03-31
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Eyad H. Hammad, Defendant-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9733 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rule Order
that: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 60.04 (1) (h) of the Supreme Court Rules is amended to read: SCR 60.04 (1) (h
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116166 - 2017-09-21
that: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 60.04 (1) (h) of the Supreme Court Rules is amended to read: SCR 60.04 (1) (h
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116166 - 2017-09-21
Rule Order
that: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 60.04 (1) (h) of the Supreme Court Rules is amended to read: SCR 60.04 (1) (h
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116166 - 2014-06-30
that: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 60.04 (1) (h) of the Supreme Court Rules is amended to read: SCR 60.04 (1) (h
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116166 - 2014-06-30
State v. John H. Fisher
, v. JOHN H. FISHER, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9103 - 2005-03-31
, v. JOHN H. FISHER, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9103 - 2005-03-31
Rule Order
that: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 60.04 (1) (h) of the Supreme Court Rules is amended to read: SCR 60.04 (1) (h
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116141 - 2014-06-30
that: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 60.04 (1) (h) of the Supreme Court Rules is amended to read: SCR 60.04 (1) (h
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116141 - 2014-06-30