Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47711 - 47720 of 51987 for legal separation.

Float-Rite Park, Inc. v. Village of Somerset
-Rite does not cite any legal authority to support its argument regarding the difference between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3534 - 2005-03-31

Maurices Incorporated v. Emperor's Kitchen, Inc.
would be the subject of a potential legal dispute, before any tests were performed on the merchandise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15685 - 2010-07-26

Ohio State Department of Taxation v. Ronald E. Skelton
Skelton was aware of the litigation and before Skelton was served with any legal documents. About two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14445 - 2005-03-31

Reginald C. Bruskewitz v. Tellurian, Inc.
the proper legal standard, and used a demonstrated rational process to reach a conclusion that a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14447 - 2005-03-31

Douglas Ingram v. David H. Schwarz
of record and reaches a conclusion based on a logical rationale and founded on proper legal standards. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13669 - 2005-03-31

State v. Royce Minnich
that it was legally acceptable for Minnich to plead to first-degree murder based on the facts he was willing to admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13668 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lynne Layber
on ‘considerations of everyday life on which reasonable and prudent persons, not legal technicians act.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13963 - 2014-07-22

COURT OF APPEALS
if pretextual, is irrelevant to Fourth-Amendment analysis because there was a legally permissible basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31601 - 2008-01-22

State v. Brandon G. Knaack
generally bars a party from taking a position in a legal proceeding that is inconsistent with a subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14296 - 2005-03-31

State v. David C. Hertzberg
the person who has legal custody of the child to appear personally, and, if the court so orders, to bring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9494 - 2011-03-31