Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47711 - 47720 of 56175 for n y c.
Search results 47711 - 47720 of 56175 for n y c.
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
reach the prejudice prong of the ineffective assistance test. C. Evidentiary Ruling. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
reach the prejudice prong of the ineffective assistance test. C. Evidentiary Ruling. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
County: JAMES C. BABLER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BRUNNER, J.1 Richard Hoeft appeals, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30222 - 2014-09-15
County: JAMES C. BABLER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BRUNNER, J.1 Richard Hoeft appeals, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30222 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the hearing for February 24, 2023. See WIS. STAT. § 813.125(3)(c) (requiring a court to hold a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987464 - 2025-07-24
the hearing for February 24, 2023. See WIS. STAT. § 813.125(3)(c) (requiring a court to hold a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987464 - 2025-07-24
State v. John A. Gatt
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13938 - 2005-03-31
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13938 - 2005-03-31
State v. Quentin L. Rogers
from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: elsa c. lamelas, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14655 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: elsa c. lamelas, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14655 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeremy A. Janz
] This appeal is decided by a single judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2] Because the mistrial order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13927 - 2005-03-31
] This appeal is decided by a single judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2] Because the mistrial order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13927 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2021-22). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710100 - 2023-10-04
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2021-22). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710100 - 2023-10-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. C. No. 2021CF506) Before Gill, J.1 Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092279 - 2026-03-17
. C. No. 2021CF506) Before Gill, J.1 Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092279 - 2026-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. C. No. 2021CF506) Before Gill, J.1 Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092279 - 2026-03-17
. C. No. 2021CF506) Before Gill, J.1 Summary disposition orders may not be cited in any court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092279 - 2026-03-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
(Ct. App. 1989) (“[C]ases should be decided on the narrowest possible ground.”). By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58004 - 2014-09-15
(Ct. App. 1989) (“[C]ases should be decided on the narrowest possible ground.”). By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58004 - 2014-09-15