Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47711 - 47720 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.

Scott Development Company, L.L.C. v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
that the remaining property’s value was reduced after the taking. Scott claims, therefore, that the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15949 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John R. Stambaugh
violation of a civil injunction, contrary to § 785.01(1)(b), STATS. He claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11922 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to evaluate claims of multiplicity: (1) whether the charged offenses are identical in law and fact; and (2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174935 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 12
insurance policy from Glens Falls, which Bormann claimed was liable to him for the damages arising out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27312 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
raises the following claims on appeal: (1) the Department acted arbitrarily by refusing to accept his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72493 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
to Nellum’s claims, the trial court did consider many of the mitigating factors presented. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27378 - 2006-12-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of damages has been redacted from the record. 5 The parties settled claims unrelated to access damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208336 - 2018-02-15

COURT OF APPEALS
by Jones, and the circuit court conducted a hearing to consider the claim. ¶4 Armond Pride
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88418 - 2012-10-22

[PDF] Everett Carlson v. Oconto County Board of Canvassers
WIS. STAT. § 9.01. The statute is the exclusive remedy for any claimed election fraud
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2765 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” and “improper favoritism inherent in the ‘reserve juror’ system,” but then withdrew these claims after further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594879 - 2022-11-29