Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47741 - 47750 of 68969 for had.

State v. Richard D. Hubatch
is not disputed. At the motion hearing, the circuit judge noted that the city had been prosecuting refusals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12995 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
observed that the circuit court had imposed two mandatory DNA surcharges at sentencing, apparently
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204716 - 2017-12-04

COURT OF APPEALS
was issued, January 16, 2010, the law had changed, and insureds could stack coverages under multiple policies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132775 - 2015-01-13

[PDF] Joan A. Lang v. Allstate Insurance Company
to Lang, we reverse. At the time of the accident, the tortfeasor had bodily injury liability limits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10887 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
, the Wisconsin legislature repealed the mandate that circuit courts had to consider sentencing guidelines. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94400 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Mark Alan Harvat v. Regina Anne Harvat
were the same age, that both were sufficiently healthy to continue working, that their estate had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11817 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Town Board of Montrose v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin
the county board appeal process had run to completion, and that “the date of approval” of the CUP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5763 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Timothy in default, explaining that the court had denied Timothy’s request to appear by telephone
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134109 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
assault of a child as a repeater. The charge stemmed from a sexual relationship that LaBarbera had during
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141956 - 2015-05-19

CA Blank Order
was amended to accurately reflect that Barnes had been found guilty of a Class E felony, not a Class C felony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138449 - 2015-03-23