Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47751 - 47760 of 82543 for case codes/1000.
Search results 47751 - 47760 of 82543 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724162 - 2023-11-08
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724162 - 2023-11-08
[PDF]
State v. Dwayne E. Thompson
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3245-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13235 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-3245-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13235 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a hit and run, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.70(5) in Washington County case No. 2015CM386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197982 - 2017-10-18
as a hit and run, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.70(5) in Washington County case No. 2015CM386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197982 - 2017-10-18
[PDF]
Bankers Trust Company of California, N.A. v. Dan Bregant
2003 WI App 86 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2085
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5531 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 86 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2085
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5531 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
a wrongful death claim. The court also concluded, “Based on the undisputed facts of the case, [Affolter] has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64786 - 2011-05-23
a wrongful death claim. The court also concluded, “Based on the undisputed facts of the case, [Affolter] has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64786 - 2011-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422180 - 2021-09-08
2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422180 - 2021-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
the “failure to prove the specific date of the offense is not fatal to the [S]tate’s case against [a] defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147234 - 2015-08-26
the “failure to prove the specific date of the offense is not fatal to the [S]tate’s case against [a] defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147234 - 2015-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Extruder Corp., 533 F. Supp. 1205 (E.D. Wis. 1982). This case was first cited in Jacobson’s response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134102 - 2017-09-21
Extruder Corp., 533 F. Supp. 1205 (E.D. Wis. 1982). This case was first cited in Jacobson’s response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
No. 2007AP32-CR 3 to pick up Jones for each court appearance in Lenell’s case and stay with him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31063 - 2014-09-15
No. 2007AP32-CR 3 to pick up Jones for each court appearance in Lenell’s case and stay with him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31063 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
suppression issue when she pled no contest. In a June 29, 2005 order in this case, this court explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20173 - 2014-09-15
suppression issue when she pled no contest. In a June 29, 2005 order in this case, this court explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20173 - 2014-09-15