Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47771 - 47780 of 84095 for case number.
Search results 47771 - 47780 of 84095 for case number.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
case law. See State v. Gilbert, 115 Wis. 2d 371, 375-76, 380, 340 N.W.2d 511 (1983) (holding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328062 - 2021-01-27
case law. See State v. Gilbert, 115 Wis. 2d 371, 375-76, 380, 340 N.W.2d 511 (1983) (holding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328062 - 2021-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶2 The State charged Bostick in Racine County case no. 2009CF21 with first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234713 - 2019-02-20
. ¶2 The State charged Bostick in Racine County case no. 2009CF21 with first-degree intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234713 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
Paul J. May v. Tri-County Trails Commission
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0588 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12145 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0588 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12145 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case need not be repeated here. It suffices to state that Riley previously appealed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213511 - 2018-05-30
of this case need not be repeated here. It suffices to state that Riley previously appealed from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213511 - 2018-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
2011 WI App 87 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1322
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64241 - 2009-08-31
2011 WI App 87 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1322
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64241 - 2009-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the case. Burridge conceded he had only requested the discovery from his former counsel “within the last
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57625 - 2010-12-13
to the case. Burridge conceded he had only requested the discovery from his former counsel “within the last
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57625 - 2010-12-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
would affect his case. There are three components required to establish a Brady violation: “(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004100 - 2025-09-03
would affect his case. There are three components required to establish a Brady violation: “(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1004100 - 2025-09-03
COURT OF APPEALS
the surcharge imposed in the instant case. Next, Neal’s postconviction counsel filed a motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65051 - 2012-11-06
the surcharge imposed in the instant case. Next, Neal’s postconviction counsel filed a motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65051 - 2012-11-06
COURT OF APPEALS
being present for the incident and the case went to trial. A jury found Schlemm guilty and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
being present for the incident and the case went to trial. A jury found Schlemm guilty and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=519284 - 2022-05-11
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=519284 - 2022-05-11