Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47771 - 47780 of 84303 for case number.
Search results 47771 - 47780 of 84303 for case number.
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this case because WIS. STAT. § 908.01(4) (2005-06), states that a witness’s prior inconsistent statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30565 - 2014-09-15
in this case because WIS. STAT. § 908.01(4) (2005-06), states that a witness’s prior inconsistent statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30565 - 2014-09-15
Village of Tigerton v. Donald Minniecheske
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1933
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11071 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1933
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11071 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
surcharge to support a motion vacating the surcharge imposed in the instant case. Next, Neal’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65051 - 2014-09-15
surcharge to support a motion vacating the surcharge imposed in the instant case. Next, Neal’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65051 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the victims in this case (“Sam,” “Keith,” and “Ronald”). No. 2022AP337 3 denied Brim’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682443 - 2023-07-26
to the victims in this case (“Sam,” “Keith,” and “Ronald”). No. 2022AP337 3 denied Brim’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682443 - 2023-07-26
Paul J. May v. Tri-County Trails Commission
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12145 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0588
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12145 - 2005-03-31
State v. Parish D. Perkins
court in this case concluded that Perkins had not met either prong of the Strickland test. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14137 - 2005-03-31
court in this case concluded that Perkins had not met either prong of the Strickland test. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14137 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not compensable, and dismissed the case. Additionally, prior to the trial the court had granted partial summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244023 - 2019-07-23
not compensable, and dismissed the case. Additionally, prior to the trial the court had granted partial summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244023 - 2019-07-23
State v. Deborah J. Zimmerman
2001 WI App 238 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-3173-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3301 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 238 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-3173-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3301 - 2005-03-31
Lacrosse County Department of Social Services v. Rose K.
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8450 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8450 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to the case. Burridge conceded he had only requested the discovery from his former counsel “within the last
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57625 - 2010-12-13
to the case. Burridge conceded he had only requested the discovery from his former counsel “within the last
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57625 - 2010-12-13