Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47771 - 47780 of 57641 for id.

CA Blank Order
to the circuit court’s discretion. See id. Our review of the record confirms that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104336 - 2013-11-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to each factor is committed to the court’s discretion. Id. Our review of the record confirms
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060970 - 2026-01-13

CA Blank Order
) the adequacy of the plaintiff’s explanation for the need to dismiss. Id. at 49. On review, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97089 - 2013-05-21

State v. Ralph E. Harris
for protection. Id. at 427, 415 N.W.2d at 541. The record shows that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8813 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
the relevant constitutional standard is viewed independently. Id. Feinberg’s identification was based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125185 - 2011-03-28

COURT OF APPEALS
a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach. Id. ¶5 The circuit court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43093 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction relief in his or her original, supplemental or amended motion.” Id., 185 Wis. 2d at 185, 517 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29627 - 2007-07-09

CA Blank Order
of hindsight, are “virtually unchallengeable” and do not constitute ineffective assistance. Id. at 690-91; see
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104017 - 2013-11-12

State v. Steven T. Miller
despite the inadequacy of the record at the plea hearing. Id. at 274, 389 N.W.2d at 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9136 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jane M. Roney
was informed of his right to counsel and right against self-incrimination. Id. (Citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9071 - 2007-11-20