Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47771 - 47780 of 82401 for simple case.
Search results 47771 - 47780 of 82401 for simple case.
[PDF]
State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
testified that Penigar adamantly opposed taking his case to trial. They testified that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12751 - 2017-09-21
testified that Penigar adamantly opposed taking his case to trial. They testified that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12751 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel T.
2003 WI App 200 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-1189
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6444 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 200 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-1189
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6444 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement imposed in this case, he was also serving “23 month[s] on revocation” in another case and “9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1136659 - 2026-06-24
confinement imposed in this case, he was also serving “23 month[s] on revocation” in another case and “9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1136659 - 2026-06-24
State v. Lonnie J. Kvapil
is and decide the case based on the testimony, base on – rather than on something that you know from outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12315 - 2005-03-31
is and decide the case based on the testimony, base on – rather than on something that you know from outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12315 - 2005-03-31
State v. Trempealeau County Board of Adjustment
setback requirement. ¶10 In the present case, both the property owners and the board argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15852 - 2005-03-31
setback requirement. ¶10 In the present case, both the property owners and the board argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15852 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
SC-6071V, 11/19 Post-Judgment: Basic Steps for Handling a Small Claims NON-EARNINGS GARNISHMENT
laws change often. The small claims forms are intended to be useful in many cases, but you may have
/formdisplay/SC-6071V_instructions.pdf?formNumber=SC-6071V&formType=Instructions&formatId=2&language=en - 2020-03-03
laws change often. The small claims forms are intended to be useful in many cases, but you may have
/formdisplay/SC-6071V_instructions.pdf?formNumber=SC-6071V&formType=Instructions&formatId=2&language=en - 2020-03-03
Derek W. v. Susan K.B.
by Susan, and that Susan had not visited or communicated with Brenda. ¶4 The case proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4074 - 2005-03-31
by Susan, and that Susan had not visited or communicated with Brenda. ¶4 The case proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4074 - 2005-03-31
State v. Willie E. Harris
.” At the end of its case, the State presented a stipulation signed by Harris, in which he agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21064 - 2006-01-30
.” At the end of its case, the State presented a stipulation signed by Harris, in which he agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21064 - 2006-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition.1 See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).2 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917151 - 2025-02-20
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition.1 See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).2 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917151 - 2025-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP1313 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1136648 - 2026-06-24
. No. 2024AP1313 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1136648 - 2026-06-24