Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47781 - 47790 of 74837 for public records.
Search results 47781 - 47790 of 74837 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the transcript for that hearing, identified as Record 82 in the Amended Index, incorrectly lists the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174307 - 2017-09-21
that the transcript for that hearing, identified as Record 82 in the Amended Index, incorrectly lists the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174307 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gerald A. Edson
failure to electronically record his police interview; (4) the charges were multiplicitous; (5) his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10356 - 2017-09-20
failure to electronically record his police interview; (4) the charges were multiplicitous; (5) his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10356 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing because the record conclusively demonstrates that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190513 - 2017-09-21
the postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing because the record conclusively demonstrates that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190513 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James E. Thomas
a question of fact, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14398 - 2014-09-15
a question of fact, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14398 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 124
to search the original record for each one to discover, if he [or she] can, whether appellant should prevail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28363 - 2007-04-26
to search the original record for each one to discover, if he [or she] can, whether appellant should prevail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28363 - 2007-04-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2016. The record reflects that the schedule listed “Union 76” under the pension and retirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001017 - 2025-08-26
2016. The record reflects that the schedule listed “Union 76” under the pension and retirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001017 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
, “a reviewing court may not find, based on the record, that there was a valid waiver of counsel.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59567 - 2014-09-15
, “a reviewing court may not find, based on the record, that there was a valid waiver of counsel.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59567 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on-the-record waiver of his Fifth Amendment right to testify was unknowing and involuntary; (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89960 - 2014-09-15
on-the-record waiver of his Fifth Amendment right to testify was unknowing and involuntary; (2) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89960 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of trial counsel, his on-the-record waiver of his Fifth Amendment right to testify was unknowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89960 - 2012-12-04
assistance of trial counsel, his on-the-record waiver of his Fifth Amendment right to testify was unknowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89960 - 2012-12-04
State v. Emanuel P.
that there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the grounds alleged in the TPR action, and in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15635 - 2005-03-31
that there was sufficient evidence in the record to support the grounds alleged in the TPR action, and in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15635 - 2005-03-31