Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47791 - 47800 of 59533 for do.
Search results 47791 - 47800 of 59533 for do.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record.” Accordingly, “restitution is the rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098769 - 2026-04-01
substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record.” Accordingly, “restitution is the rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098769 - 2026-04-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an expansive restriction on a supervised person’s movement when a narrow one would do, it violates due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017721 - 2025-10-01
an expansive restriction on a supervised person’s movement when a narrow one would do, it violates due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017721 - 2025-10-01
State v. Steven M. Zoromski
to support a minor victim’s credibility was an impermissible purpose. We do not decide whether other acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14322 - 2005-03-31
to support a minor victim’s credibility was an impermissible purpose. We do not decide whether other acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14322 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that this conviction also “do[es] not merit the maximum penalty.” He reasons that even though he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84332 - 2012-07-02
argues that this conviction also “do[es] not merit the maximum penalty.” He reasons that even though he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84332 - 2012-07-02
State v. Martha P.
that her lack of adequate housing prevented her from doing so. This assertion is countered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7139 - 2005-03-31
that her lack of adequate housing prevented her from doing so. This assertion is countered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7139 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dallas D. Lucas
41]; the near-maximum consecutive sentences do not represent the minimum amount of custody consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7105 - 2005-03-31
41]; the near-maximum consecutive sentences do not represent the minimum amount of custody consistent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7105 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rodney Calhoun
that the State had no choice but to present Calhoun's wife's testimony when the court directed it to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9760 - 2005-03-31
that the State had no choice but to present Calhoun's wife's testimony when the court directed it to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9760 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
are limited to foreseeable damages. We do not consider arguments unsupported by citation to authority. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33266 - 2008-06-30
are limited to foreseeable damages. We do not consider arguments unsupported by citation to authority. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33266 - 2008-06-30
Reynauld Quiles v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins.
or intervening contextual shifts in the law; (3) do significant differences in the quality or extensiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14638 - 2005-03-31
or intervening contextual shifts in the law; (3) do significant differences in the quality or extensiveness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14638 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
at the conclusion of the hearing on June 6, 2000, when she first appeared with her attorney. We do not decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3705 - 2005-03-31
at the conclusion of the hearing on June 6, 2000, when she first appeared with her attorney. We do not decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3705 - 2005-03-31