Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47821 - 47830 of 68502 for did.
Search results 47821 - 47830 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Antonio Jones
). The record does not support Jones’s misuse of discretion claim. The court did not sentence Jones for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14343 - 2014-09-15
). The record does not support Jones’s misuse of discretion claim. The court did not sentence Jones for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14343 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of sixteen months, but did not file the response. On September 10, 2021, we denied Mitton’s request
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602068 - 2022-12-21
of sixteen months, but did not file the response. On September 10, 2021, we denied Mitton’s request
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602068 - 2022-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
We note that McKinney did not fully develop his suppression argument in the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107431 - 2017-09-21
We note that McKinney did not fully develop his suppression argument in the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107431 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that his submission did not include a table of contents, a statement of issues, or a table of authorities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160073 - 2017-09-21
that his submission did not include a table of contents, a statement of issues, or a table of authorities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160073 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
do not satisfy the requirements for ‘newly-discovered’ evidence because the evidence did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617314 - 2023-02-02
do not satisfy the requirements for ‘newly-discovered’ evidence because the evidence did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617314 - 2023-02-02
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Cunningham
of the relevant factors to each of the sentences it imposed. It did so. It did not need to expressly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6570 - 2017-09-19
of the relevant factors to each of the sentences it imposed. It did so. It did not need to expressly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6570 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Xhevat Tahiri
of the sixty-day deadline. Nor did he file the brief until September 30, beyond the two-week deadline set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11705 - 2017-09-20
of the sixty-day deadline. Nor did he file the brief until September 30, beyond the two-week deadline set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11705 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because at the time, Tammy did not know where she would reside. Given the uncertainty of Tammy’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463509 - 2021-12-22
because at the time, Tammy did not know where she would reside. Given the uncertainty of Tammy’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463509 - 2021-12-22
State v. James R. Harris
the photographs. Harris did not specifically object to the timing of the photographs’ publication, nor did he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11102 - 2005-03-31
the photographs. Harris did not specifically object to the timing of the photographs’ publication, nor did he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11102 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). No. 2015AP1248-NM 2 and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32. A.D.B. did not file a response. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149726 - 2017-09-21
). No. 2015AP1248-NM 2 and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32. A.D.B. did not file a response. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149726 - 2017-09-21