Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47821 - 47830 of 74837 for public records.
Search results 47821 - 47830 of 74837 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the No. 2023AP1173-CR 2 briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855996 - 2024-10-02
of the No. 2023AP1173-CR 2 briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855996 - 2024-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319088 - 2020-12-29
withdrawal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319088 - 2020-12-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
$2,537,265.92. No. 2023AP185 2 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821311 - 2024-07-02
$2,537,265.92. No. 2023AP185 2 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821311 - 2024-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
medical examination (IME). Based on the history Payne provided and some medical records, Krug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177596 - 2017-09-21
medical examination (IME). Based on the history Payne provided and some medical records, Krug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177596 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and orders from other courts, and statements contained in an attorney’s affidavit; (3) the record was devoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42978 - 2009-11-03
and orders from other courts, and statements contained in an attorney’s affidavit; (3) the record was devoid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42978 - 2009-11-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
made findings “to clarify the record” but expressly took no position as to whether those findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108145 - 2017-09-21
made findings “to clarify the record” but expressly took no position as to whether those findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108145 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mack McClinton
and submitting record); WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(e) & (3)(a), (appellate arguments must be supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14222 - 2014-09-15
and submitting record); WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(e) & (3)(a), (appellate arguments must be supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14222 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jens O. Luebow v. Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing
principles and did not consider the facts of record, including the board’s own failure to be cooperative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3660 - 2017-09-19
principles and did not consider the facts of record, including the board’s own failure to be cooperative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3660 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
issues. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699165 - 2023-09-06
issues. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699165 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the record did not support that assertion but, if a motion to withdraw his plea were filed, the court would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28749 - 2014-09-15
that the record did not support that assertion but, if a motion to withdraw his plea were filed, the court would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28749 - 2014-09-15