Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47831 - 47840 of 82543 for case codes/1000.
Search results 47831 - 47840 of 82543 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by Fischer’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210778 - 2018-04-11
. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by Fischer’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210778 - 2018-04-11
COURT OF APPEALS
At the sentencing hearing, Greenwood’s counsel explained that, as a result of this case, Greenwood’s extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143667 - 2015-06-29
At the sentencing hearing, Greenwood’s counsel explained that, as a result of this case, Greenwood’s extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143667 - 2015-06-29
Gerald G. Geyso v. Richard Daly
2005 WI App 18 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-0748 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7384 - 2005-03-31
2005 WI App 18 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-0748 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7384 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in part by Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶2 (withdrawing “any language” in several cases suggesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53663 - 2010-08-23
in part by Tiepelman, 291 Wis. 2d 179, ¶2 (withdrawing “any language” in several cases suggesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53663 - 2010-08-23
James A. Billington v. Wilbert C. Oldenhoff
are in dispute. Selzer, 2002 WI App 232, ¶10. In this case we are required to interpret Wis. Stat. § 632.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6943 - 2005-03-31
are in dispute. Selzer, 2002 WI App 232, ¶10. In this case we are required to interpret Wis. Stat. § 632.32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6943 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as a consecutive sentence to the sentence imposed in another case. A consecutive sentence was imposed consisting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160536 - 2017-09-21
as a consecutive sentence to the sentence imposed in another case. A consecutive sentence was imposed consisting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160536 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Antwaun Vance v. James J. Sukup
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9828 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9828 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP2087-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629875 - 2023-03-07
. No. 2021AP2087-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629875 - 2023-03-07
[PDF]
Debra M. Wikel v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
2001 WI App 214 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3215
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3322 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 214 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3215
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3322 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. The case proceeded to trial. Zabala did not testify in his own defense. Zabala’s lawyer argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95094 - 2014-09-15
. The case proceeded to trial. Zabala did not testify in his own defense. Zabala’s lawyer argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95094 - 2014-09-15