Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47831 - 47840 of 68502 for did.
Search results 47831 - 47840 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Carl E. Cunningham
of the relevant factors to each of the sentences it imposed. It did so. It did not need to expressly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6570 - 2017-09-19
of the relevant factors to each of the sentences it imposed. It did so. It did not need to expressly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6570 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Xhevat Tahiri
of the sixty-day deadline. Nor did he file the brief until September 30, beyond the two-week deadline set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11705 - 2017-09-20
of the sixty-day deadline. Nor did he file the brief until September 30, beyond the two-week deadline set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11705 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because at the time, Tammy did not know where she would reside. Given the uncertainty of Tammy’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463509 - 2021-12-22
because at the time, Tammy did not know where she would reside. Given the uncertainty of Tammy’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463509 - 2021-12-22
State v. James R. Harris
the photographs. Harris did not specifically object to the timing of the photographs’ publication, nor did he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11102 - 2005-03-31
the photographs. Harris did not specifically object to the timing of the photographs’ publication, nor did he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11102 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). No. 2015AP1248-NM 2 and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32. A.D.B. did not file a response. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149726 - 2017-09-21
). No. 2015AP1248-NM 2 and WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32. A.D.B. did not file a response. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149726 - 2017-09-21
[MS WORD]
FA-4176V: Decision and Order for Contempt
|_| appeared by phone |_| did not appear AND |_| A. was self-represented. |_| B
/formdisplay/FA-4176V.doc?formNumber=FA-4176V&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-06-13
|_| appeared by phone |_| did not appear AND |_| A. was self-represented. |_| B
/formdisplay/FA-4176V.doc?formNumber=FA-4176V&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-06-13
State v. John D. Tiggs, Jr.
that statement at a later hearing and did permit entry of Tiggs’ plea pursuant to a plea agreement. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24816 - 2006-04-12
that statement at a later hearing and did permit entry of Tiggs’ plea pursuant to a plea agreement. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24816 - 2006-04-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
Kirchman concluded that the Planning and Zoning Committee did not have authority to grant a conditional use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26911 - 2006-10-25
Kirchman concluded that the Planning and Zoning Committee did not have authority to grant a conditional use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26911 - 2006-10-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The issue is whether the officer possessed reasonable suspicion for this seizure. We conclude that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28645 - 2014-09-15
. The issue is whether the officer possessed reasonable suspicion for this seizure. We conclude that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28645 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the reasons for the disciplinary action. He claims the hearing officer did not meet this burden. According
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132791 - 2017-09-21
and the reasons for the disciplinary action. He claims the hearing officer did not meet this burden. According
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132791 - 2017-09-21