Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47831 - 47840 of 57740 for id.
Search results 47831 - 47840 of 57740 for id.
State v. Todd A. Imme
and that the jury is permitted to rely on the stipulation in its factfinding. See id. at 168, 552 N.W.2d at 132-33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11320 - 2011-10-17
and that the jury is permitted to rely on the stipulation in its factfinding. See id. at 168, 552 N.W.2d at 132-33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11320 - 2011-10-17
State v. Katie K.
that such driving was without the owner’s consent. See id. The application of law to undisputed facts presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13014 - 2005-03-31
that such driving was without the owner’s consent. See id. The application of law to undisputed facts presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13014 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id., ¶25. ¶7 On appeal, Klotz acknowledges that he is not entitled to sentence credit under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98064 - 2015-04-28
.” Id., ¶25. ¶7 On appeal, Klotz acknowledges that he is not entitled to sentence credit under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98064 - 2015-04-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because the surcharge is not punishment and is, therefore, not a direct consequence of the plea. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218946 - 2018-09-11
because the surcharge is not punishment and is, therefore, not a direct consequence of the plea. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218946 - 2018-09-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court’s decision unless it erroneously exercised its discretion. Id. ¶5 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68324 - 2014-09-15
the trial court’s decision unless it erroneously exercised its discretion. Id. ¶5 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68324 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
modification. Id., ¶1. Here, Hicks is not appealing the denial of a postconviction motion in which he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208090 - 2018-02-02
modification. Id., ¶1. Here, Hicks is not appealing the denial of a postconviction motion in which he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208090 - 2018-02-02
[PDF]
State v. Landris T. Jines
. See id. at 640-41. Stated otherwise, the defendant must show that counsel’s errors had an actual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18671 - 2017-09-21
. See id. at 640-41. Stated otherwise, the defendant must show that counsel’s errors had an actual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18671 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas L. Leck
an objective standard based upon the circumstances as they were at the time of the arrest. Id. at 476, 531
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10119 - 2017-09-19
an objective standard based upon the circumstances as they were at the time of the arrest. Id. at 476, 531
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10119 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of fraud and false signing.3 A litigant cannot substitute argument for evidence. See id. at 244
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94334 - 2014-09-15
of fraud and false signing.3 A litigant cannot substitute argument for evidence. See id. at 244
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94334 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
could reach.” Id. On appeal, Peter improperly reargues the facts, rather than presenting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141514 - 2017-09-21
could reach.” Id. On appeal, Peter improperly reargues the facts, rather than presenting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141514 - 2017-09-21