Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4791 - 4800 of 83724 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 4791 - 4800 of 83724 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they acted outside the scope of the traffic stop when they asked for permission to search him. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109998 - 2017-09-21
they acted outside the scope of the traffic stop when they asked for permission to search him. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109998 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Justin Kolp
2002 WI App 17 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0549-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3661 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 17 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-0549-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3661 - 2017-09-19
State v. Justin Kolp
2002 WI App 17 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0549-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3661 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 17 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-0549-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3661 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
challenge to the validity of the search warrant in this case, however, to the “oath or affirmation” clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285079 - 2020-09-09
challenge to the validity of the search warrant in this case, however, to the “oath or affirmation” clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285079 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
Famous Cases of the Wisconsin Supreme Court - State v. Stevens
such case. In this case, a divided Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that police may seize and search
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases19.pdf - 2009-11-17
such case. In this case, a divided Wisconsin Supreme Court determined that police may seize and search
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases19.pdf - 2009-11-17
[PDF]
State v. Patrice M. Ehrenberger
; and (2) if the latter, was there probable cause to arrest in this case. We conclude that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15078 - 2017-09-21
; and (2) if the latter, was there probable cause to arrest in this case. We conclude that, under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15078 - 2017-09-21
State v. Patrice M. Ehrenberger
Bentley and the instant case, is an “exigent circumstances” case—one in which a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15078 - 2005-03-31
Bentley and the instant case, is an “exigent circumstances” case—one in which a warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15078 - 2005-03-31
Town of Grand Chute v. Outagamie County
2004 WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1897-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6682 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1897-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6682 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
noted the local OWI guidelines, which in Weaver’s case provided for a jail sentence of 110 days, or 140
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147680 - 2015-08-30
noted the local OWI guidelines, which in Weaver’s case provided for a jail sentence of 110 days, or 140
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147680 - 2015-08-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
and the state. Plaintiffs’ second argument simply misreads cases to create a requirement not in the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31597 - 2014-09-15
and the state. Plaintiffs’ second argument simply misreads cases to create a requirement not in the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31597 - 2014-09-15