Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47911 - 47920 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
addresses whether the evidence was sufficient to support the jury verdict. A claim of insufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=908247 - 2025-02-04

[PDF] State v. Esther T.
from an order terminating her parental rights to Deon R.D., Jr. Esther claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4354 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
comply with this rule in future court filings. Turning to the merits, a defendant claiming
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194017 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1. To succeed on a claim for sentencing based on inaccurate information
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000743 - 2025-08-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
therefore arise if Underland claimed he did not know that the court was free to impose a sentence greater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756081 - 2024-01-30

COURT OF APPEALS
was not found where T.B. had claimed blood would be. ¶4 The jury returned guilty verdicts. Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92258 - 2013-01-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the circuit court judge’s decision not to disqualify himself, Rhonda’s claim for recusal was based on WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110999 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David Mikel
nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. County of Racine v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12419 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
claims, after the time for direct appeal has passed, arises under WIS. STAT. § 974.06. A § 974.06
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069253 - 2026-01-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
with appellate counsel that there is no arguable merit to a claim that Marshall’s pleas were invalid. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573562 - 2022-10-04