Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47911 - 47920 of 68275 for did.
Search results 47911 - 47920 of 68275 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
the treatment he received in the community did not work. The court stated: “We know that good sex-offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121309 - 2014-09-08
the treatment he received in the community did not work. The court stated: “We know that good sex-offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121309 - 2014-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
because he did not object to the locked doors at trial, and that Herrera’s ineffective assistance argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47128 - 2010-02-16
because he did not object to the locked doors at trial, and that Herrera’s ineffective assistance argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47128 - 2010-02-16
COURT OF APPEALS
student in the classroom, the teacher “dropped to the floor.” The teacher testified that he did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90260 - 2012-12-11
student in the classroom, the teacher “dropped to the floor.” The teacher testified that he did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90260 - 2012-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
, the informant called Chris and arranged a heroin purchase at a mall. Police did not intend to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34795 - 2008-12-03
, the informant called Chris and arranged a heroin purchase at a mall. Police did not intend to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34795 - 2008-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 (WI App Jan. 28, 2003). Because Ray’s trial counsel did not object to the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30452 - 2007-10-01
. ¶1 (WI App Jan. 28, 2003). Because Ray’s trial counsel did not object to the admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30452 - 2007-10-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
).3 Consequently, the trial court did not exceed the maximum potential penalty for burglary when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33534 - 2014-09-15
).3 Consequently, the trial court did not exceed the maximum potential penalty for burglary when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33534 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Enrique Ayala Trujillo
12, 23-25 (1986). We conclude that it did. The trial court went over each of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8755 - 2017-09-19
12, 23-25 (1986). We conclude that it did. The trial court went over each of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8755 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
could successfully raise a defense or other claim on appeal that he did not initially raise. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123241 - 2017-09-21
could successfully raise a defense or other claim on appeal that he did not initially raise. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123241 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Xhevat Tahiri
of the sixty-day deadline. Nor did he file the brief until September 30, beyond the two-week deadline set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11704 - 2017-09-20
of the sixty-day deadline. Nor did he file the brief until September 30, beyond the two-week deadline set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11704 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel. L.L. did not submit any materials in opposition to the motion for summary judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184767 - 2017-09-21
counsel. L.L. did not submit any materials in opposition to the motion for summary judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184767 - 2017-09-21