Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47911 - 47920 of 83431 for simple case search.
Search results 47911 - 47920 of 83431 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction request to reconsider a motion to dismiss that was denied earlier in the case. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072098 - 2026-02-03
postconviction request to reconsider a motion to dismiss that was denied earlier in the case. Based upon our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072098 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191011 - 2017-09-21
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191011 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Marion had already received a substantial sentence in a separate case in Ozaukee County. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476748 - 2022-02-01
that Marion had already received a substantial sentence in a separate case in Ozaukee County. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476748 - 2022-02-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the State agreed, among other things, to recommend that the sentence in the present case run concurrent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68656 - 2014-09-15
, the State agreed, among other things, to recommend that the sentence in the present case run concurrent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68656 - 2014-09-15
Waukesha County Department Of Health and Human Services v. John S.
when it denied her motion to sever her case from John's case for trial. She states that the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10159 - 2005-03-31
when it denied her motion to sever her case from John's case for trial. She states that the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10159 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that it applies to this case. For purposes of this decision, we read § 980.038(6) in harmony with the time limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85185 - 2012-07-24
that it applies to this case. For purposes of this decision, we read § 980.038(6) in harmony with the time limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85185 - 2012-07-24
Frontsheet
2015 WI 16 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2014AP1523-D Complete Title: Office
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135212 - 2015-02-16
2015 WI 16 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2014AP1523-D Complete Title: Office
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135212 - 2015-02-16
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117168 - 2014-07-13
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117168 - 2014-07-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the pending case that he had here in Racine.” In sum, the record reflects that the delay in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249332 - 2019-10-30
of the pending case that he had here in Racine.” In sum, the record reflects that the delay in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249332 - 2019-10-30
[PDF]
Van Buren Management, Inc. v. Joseph W. Checota
settled in December 1993. In April 1994, the trial court entered an order dismissing the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9239 - 2017-09-19
settled in December 1993. In April 1994, the trial court entered an order dismissing the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9239 - 2017-09-19