Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47931 - 47940 of 59511 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] State v. Aaron N.
witness testimony. He claims that his due process rights were violated as a result. The admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6671 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred in concluding that legal justification existed for a stop. First, Popke claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33681 - 2008-08-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
].” ¶14 Michael’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel fails for these and other reasons. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163765 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Goodson, 2009 WI App 107, ¶8, 320 Wis. 2d 166, 771 N.W.2d 385. “When analyzing a judicial bias claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=764456 - 2024-02-21

State v. Jonathan L. Franklin
N.W.2d 912, 918 (Ct. App. 1983). Franklin’s claim that his trial attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14414 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 73
judgment on the basis that the Challengers failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146970 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
she claimed that everyone was working against her and that “they don’t want me in court today
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099973 - 2026-04-02

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Backes
. Attorney Backes responded in writing, claiming that he had reviewed the case. Attorney Backes did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20018 - 2005-10-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of a municipal ordinance based on Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). Foss claims that the circuit court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29083 - 2007-05-16

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 7, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
be revisited under claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.” See id. ¶15 Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70465 - 2011-09-06