Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47971 - 47980 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 47971 - 47980 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Lisa Prince v. Zoning Board of Appeals for Rusk County
ordinance. Furthermore, the hardship claimed by the Princes was self-created, resulting from their own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9358 - 2005-03-31
ordinance. Furthermore, the hardship claimed by the Princes was self-created, resulting from their own
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9358 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alberta P. Lessard
. It was on that basis that it found Lessard guilty of disorderly conduct. Lessard claims that there is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3062 - 2005-03-31
. It was on that basis that it found Lessard guilty of disorderly conduct. Lessard claims that there is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3062 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and/or Clarification of the Judgment of Conviction,” claiming that the written judgment conflicted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131740 - 2017-09-21
, and/or Clarification of the Judgment of Conviction,” claiming that the written judgment conflicted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131740 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jodine Y. Taylor v. Terry L. Taylor
judgment from Jodine Taylor, claiming the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6907 - 2017-09-20
judgment from Jodine Taylor, claiming the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6907 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an intoxicated patron after driving her home from a bar. Sparks first claimed he did not recall the woman
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117081 - 2017-09-21
an intoxicated patron after driving her home from a bar. Sparks first claimed he did not recall the woman
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117081 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: the court did not address Christopher’s claim that he was not fully credited for the $400 deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
: the court did not address Christopher’s claim that he was not fully credited for the $400 deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision concluding that recent decisions by the Wisconsin Supreme Court defeat any such claim. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218626 - 2018-08-31
decision concluding that recent decisions by the Wisconsin Supreme Court defeat any such claim. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218626 - 2018-08-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit to any claim related to the failure to comply with the statutory time limits. Nos
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147278 - 2017-09-21
merit to any claim related to the failure to comply with the statutory time limits. Nos
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147278 - 2017-09-21
State v. David Karich
court did not believe Karich’s claim that he did not understand the nature of the charges to which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10870 - 2005-03-31
court did not believe Karich’s claim that he did not understand the nature of the charges to which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10870 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s claim of innocence. See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37-38 (1970); accord State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44835 - 2009-12-21
the defendant’s claim of innocence. See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37-38 (1970); accord State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44835 - 2009-12-21