Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47971 - 47980 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 47971 - 47980 of 83455 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
that inculpated Mitchell, but Benson denied having made many of the statements. Then, in its rebuttal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45773 - 2010-01-13
that inculpated Mitchell, but Benson denied having made many of the statements. Then, in its rebuttal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45773 - 2010-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for reconsideration. (2021-22).1 After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754942 - 2024-01-25
for reconsideration. (2021-22).1 After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754942 - 2024-01-25
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117168 - 2014-07-13
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117168 - 2014-07-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
was sentenced in this case, August 22, 2007, he was serving a term of imprisonment imposed in Outagamie county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38058 - 2014-09-15
was sentenced in this case, August 22, 2007, he was serving a term of imprisonment imposed in Outagamie county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38058 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250478 - 2019-11-19
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250478 - 2019-11-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
gave rise to the charge in this case. Pride demanded a jury trial. ¶4 At trial, Officer Osell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33912 - 2014-09-15
gave rise to the charge in this case. Pride demanded a jury trial. ¶4 At trial, Officer Osell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33912 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy L. Walker
Ctr., Inc., 94 Wis. 2d 201, 203, 287 N.W.2d 810 (1980). As in the Northridge case: “The defect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15266 - 2017-09-21
Ctr., Inc., 94 Wis. 2d 201, 203, 287 N.W.2d 810 (1980). As in the Northridge case: “The defect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15266 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that it applies to this case. For purposes of this decision, we read § 980.038(6) in harmony with the time limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85185 - 2012-07-24
that it applies to this case. For purposes of this decision, we read § 980.038(6) in harmony with the time limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85185 - 2012-07-24
Dorothy L. Ostovich v. Robert Sanderson
in this case—whether the security deposit was mailed within the twenty-one day time period—turned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13565 - 2005-03-31
in this case—whether the security deposit was mailed within the twenty-one day time period—turned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13565 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because they are longer than the sentences imposed in numerous other cases. That argument fails
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166614 - 2017-09-21
because they are longer than the sentences imposed in numerous other cases. That argument fails
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166614 - 2017-09-21