Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47981 - 47990 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 47981 - 47990 of 83395 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
that it applies to this case. For purposes of this decision, we read § 980.038(6) in harmony with the time limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85185 - 2012-07-24
that it applies to this case. For purposes of this decision, we read § 980.038(6) in harmony with the time limit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85185 - 2012-07-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254816 - 2020-02-26
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254816 - 2020-02-26
Frontsheet
2015 WI 16 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2014AP1523-D Complete Title: Office
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135212 - 2015-02-16
2015 WI 16 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2014AP1523-D Complete Title: Office
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135212 - 2015-02-16
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117168 - 2014-07-13
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117168 - 2014-07-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
briefed by the parties because appellate courts strive to decide cases on narrow grounds, see State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183044 - 2017-09-21
briefed by the parties because appellate courts strive to decide cases on narrow grounds, see State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183044 - 2017-09-21
Associates Financial Services Company of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Jeffrey W. Abbett
. And under all the facts and circumstances of the case, I’m still satisfied that the sum bid is fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14361 - 2005-03-31
. And under all the facts and circumstances of the case, I’m still satisfied that the sum bid is fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14361 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary T. Mork
case because, had he known of the second test, he would have provided a different defense. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5530 - 2013-02-13
case because, had he known of the second test, he would have provided a different defense. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5530 - 2013-02-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because they are longer than the sentences imposed in numerous other cases. That argument fails
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166614 - 2017-09-21
because they are longer than the sentences imposed in numerous other cases. That argument fails
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166614 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
denied having made many of the statements. Then, in its rebuttal case, the State presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45773 - 2014-09-15
denied having made many of the statements. Then, in its rebuttal case, the State presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45773 - 2014-09-15
Bill A. Wells v. Tonya Partee
in which it permitted the parties to present their cases, and that Partee’s defense of retaliatory eviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2330 - 2005-03-31
in which it permitted the parties to present their cases, and that Partee’s defense of retaliatory eviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2330 - 2005-03-31