Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47991 - 48000 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 47991 - 48000 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248850 - 2019-10-16
and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248850 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments as well as Davies’ claim for damages. The court rejected the remainder of Ula-Lisa’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199531 - 2017-11-01
arguments as well as Davies’ claim for damages. The court rejected the remainder of Ula-Lisa’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199531 - 2017-11-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484167 - 2022-02-16
be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484167 - 2022-02-16
CA Blank Order
dismissing the action. Roberts moved for reconsideration, claiming that he had not been served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93368 - 2013-02-21
dismissing the action. Roberts moved for reconsideration, claiming that he had not been served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93368 - 2013-02-21
[PDF]
State v. David Mikel
nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. County of Racine v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11017 - 2017-09-19
nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. County of Racine v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11017 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
of arguable merit for appeal. The report briefly addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138015 - 2015-03-17
of arguable merit for appeal. The report briefly addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138015 - 2015-03-17
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Jonathan A. Olson
) The petitioner has made restitution or settled all claims from persons injured or harmed by petitioner’s
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17331 - 2005-03-31
) The petitioner has made restitution or settled all claims from persons injured or harmed by petitioner’s
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17331 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger E. Smiley
, there would be no merit to a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Other Issues No other issues remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13638 - 2005-03-31
, there would be no merit to a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Other Issues No other issues remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13638 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to the statement as inadmissible hearsay constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. A claim of ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114318 - 2014-06-09
to the statement as inadmissible hearsay constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. A claim of ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114318 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims. Both his November motion and the February filing are based on Riker’s allegation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077632 - 2026-02-18
claims. Both his November motion and the February filing are based on Riker’s allegation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1077632 - 2026-02-18