Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 47991 - 48000 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 47991 - 48000 of 59266 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. James Robert Schroeder
other counts of second-degree sexual assault. Schroeder claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8218 - 2005-03-31
other counts of second-degree sexual assault. Schroeder claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8218 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Spring Maclin
to Maclin's affidavit, Maclin had been unable to locate Littleton to testify at trial. Maclin claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10146 - 2017-09-19
to Maclin's affidavit, Maclin had been unable to locate Littleton to testify at trial. Maclin claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10146 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
be in the best interests of the child. Similarly, Butler’s claim that his child support is too high is not based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102230 - 2013-09-19
be in the best interests of the child. Similarly, Butler’s claim that his child support is too high is not based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102230 - 2013-09-19
State v. Mighty Howell
of the evidence claim. Because we dispose of his appeal on this overarching ground, we do not address these non
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8979 - 2005-03-31
of the evidence claim. Because we dispose of his appeal on this overarching ground, we do not address these non
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8979 - 2005-03-31
Wallace A. Stellrecht v. Donald W. Gudmanson
Williams’ performance. ¶5 We review the merits of Stellrecht’s claims of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2499 - 2005-03-31
Williams’ performance. ¶5 We review the merits of Stellrecht’s claims of ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2499 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248850 - 2019-10-16
and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248850 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments as well as Davies’ claim for damages. The court rejected the remainder of Ula-Lisa’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199531 - 2017-11-01
arguments as well as Davies’ claim for damages. The court rejected the remainder of Ula-Lisa’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199531 - 2017-11-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484167 - 2022-02-16
be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484167 - 2022-02-16
CA Blank Order
dismissing the action. Roberts moved for reconsideration, claiming that he had not been served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93368 - 2013-02-21
dismissing the action. Roberts moved for reconsideration, claiming that he had not been served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93368 - 2013-02-21
[PDF]
State v. David Mikel
nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. County of Racine v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11017 - 2017-09-19
nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. County of Racine v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11017 - 2017-09-19